Your request submitted

At Law Office of Alan Mikshansky, we know that when you’ve been injured in an accident, the last thing you want to do is add another bill you have to pay. That’s why our California personal injury lawyers offer the No Fee Guarantee.

Dismiss message


Call Us

916-692-8224 415-295-1554

follow our social media

social-link social-link social-link social-link
Muslim Woman Denied Job Over Head Scarf Wins in Supreme Court


Muslim Woman Denied Job Over Head Scarf Wins in Supreme Court

July 28, 2020

Muslim Woman Denied Job Over Head Scarf Wins in Supreme Court

Brandon Coats, a quadriplegic man who used marijuana off-duty to control muscle spasms, was fired in 2010 by Dish Network after failing a random drug test. He challenged the termination, and Dish Network’s company policies, claiming that his pot use was legal under state law – and therefore, was not a valid grounds for termination. Like Texas, Colorado law allows employers to set their own policies on drug use. Unlike Texas, Colorado has a law that says employees can’t be fired for “lawful” off-duty activities. Coats argued that pot use was “lawful” under Colorado law, and therefore, could not serve as a basis for termination. But the Court held:

“under the plain language of…Colorado’s “lawful activities statute,” the term “lawful” refers only to those activities that are lawful under both state and federal law. Therefore, employees who engage in an activity such as medical marijuana use that is permitted by state law but unlawful under federal law are not protected by the statute.”

Several states and cities have passed legislation to legalize marajuana. Whether this changes the legal landscape for employees, however, has been far from clear. Colorado’s ruling is one of the first to interpret the new marajuana laws in the employment context. The result? When it comes to firing an employee, the law hasn’t really been affected.

Back to blog list